Justice Sotomayor on abortion precedent at 2009 affirmation listening to
1 00:00:00,660 –> 00:00:06,030 >> In Deliberate Parenthood versus Casey the court docket reaffirmed the core 2 00:00:06,030 –> 00:00:12,210 holding of Roe vs. Wade {that a} girl has a constitutional proper 3 00:00:12,210 –> 00:00:17,610 to terminate her being pregnant in sure circumstances. Do you consider that 4 00:00:17,610 –> 00:00:23,210 this proper to privateness contains the fitting to have an abortion. The court docket has stated 5 00:00:23,210 –> 00:00:26,510 in lots of instances and as I feel. 6 00:00:30,230 –> 00:00:35,780 >> Has been repeated within the court docket’s jurisprudence in Casey that there’s 7 00:00:35,780 –> 00:00:41,600 a proper to privateness that ladies have. With respect to the termination of 8 00:00:41,600 –> 00:00:47,330 their pregnancies in sure conditions do you consider that the court docket’s abortion rulings have 9 00:00:47,330 –> 00:00:47,900 ended. 10 00:00:48,740 –> 00:00:50,960 >> The nationwide controversy over this problem. 11 00:00:57,420 –> 00:00:58,240 >> No.