SINGAPORE – Lim Huey Ching, the daughter of former oil tycoon Lim Oon Kuin and an executive director of insolvent Hin Leong Trading for more than 20 years, has been charged with one count of obstructing the course of justice.
The second member of the Lim family to be charged, Lim was accused of instructing Lim Chin, an IT manager at Hin Leong, on April 13, 2020, to delete IT records at a time when Hin Leong was facing probable civil proceedings or criminal investigations.
According to the charge sheets, Lim is accused of instructing Lim Chin to ensure that “deleted items on Hin Leong’s servers must not be recoverable, and that previous backups of information on Hin Leong’s servers must be disposed of permanently”.
Lim’s bail was set at $40,000 with electronic tagging.
Deputy Public Prosecutor G. Kannan had asked for her bail to be set at between $70,000 and $80,000, saying “Lim is linked to Lim Oon Kuin”, and that her offence of obstruction “revolves around instructions to delete IT records pertaining to the affairs of the company helmed by her father”.
In June, the elder Lim was handed 105 additional charges of cheating and forgery. Together with the 25 forgery-related charges filed last year and in April this year, the 79-year-old former oil tycoon now faces a total of 130 charges involving US$2.7 billion (S$3.64 billion) in alleged fraudulent loans disbursed.
Singapore prosecutors disclosed that 16 banks in Singapore have suffered US$291.9 million in “actual monetary loss” out of the US$2.7 billion in loans that they were allegedly duped into extending to Hin Leong by the elder Lim. The losses are part of the alleged US$3.5 billion debt owed by Hin Leong to the 23 banks.
But Lim’s lawyer Christopher Daniel of Advocatus Law argued that the $70,000 bail amount is too high.
In asking for bail to be set at $20,000, Mr Daniel said: “She is not a flight risk. She is based in Singapore, and her family is here. … Her passport has been with the Commercial Affairs Department since April or May last year. Her bailor is going to be her mother.”
District Judge Terence Tay, in setting the bail amount, said: “Given that there is no indication of flight risk, a bail sum of $40,000 will adequately address… with risk mitigated by e-tagging.”
Lim Oon Kuin, better known as O.K. Lim, and his two children were sued in September last year by judicial managers-turned-liquidators, Mr Goh Thien Phong and Mr Chan Kheng Tek, over US$3.5 billion plus another US$90 million in dividends the Lims allegedly paid themselves even though the company was insolvent.
They accused Lim, his son Evan Lim Chee Meng and daughter Lim Huey Ching, both executive directors for more than 20 years, of breach of fiduciary duties as directors and fraudulent trading.
They were accused of “deliberately concealing (Hin Leong’s) losses and portraying it as a profitable company when in fact it was massively insolvent”.
The alleged fraudulent activity included “the creation of fictitious gains to conceal accumulated trading and other losses, the forgery of documents, the manipulation of Hin Leong’s accounts through irregular accounting entries, the overstatement of Hin Leong’s inventory and the obtaining of financing through improper means”.
As a result, they presented a “vastly misleading picture of its financial health to external parties and deceived its lenders into extending financing even though Hin Leong has been insolvent since the financial year ended Oct 31, 2012”, Mr Goh said.
In addition, Ernst & Young, the judicial manager of Hin Leong shipping arm Ocean Tankers, also sued Lim, his son and his daughter over US$19 million allegedly transferred from Ocean Tankers’ bank account to the trio’s bank accounts just days before the company filed for the debt moratorium.