Judy Woodruff:
Meadows’ refusal to cooperate and the committee’s advice to carry him in contempt of Congress elevate questions on government privilege and about what info the committee is owed.
For some solutions, we flip to Jonathan Shaub. He’s a professor on the College of Kentucky Faculty of Legislation and a contributing editor at Lawfare. He beforehand served within the Workplace of Authorized Counsel on the Division of Justice.
And earlier than I come to you, Jonathan Shaub, I wish to make clear.
I mentioned the problem was taken up within the Senate. It was within the Home, the Home choose committee, after all, the place this investigation is underneath method.
However let me simply ask you about Mr. Meadows. He’s one more witness who will not testify earlier than this Home choose committee. However they’ve acquired paperwork. They’ve acquired some info. So is the committee being stymied, or are they making progress?
Jonathan Shaub, College of Kentucky: Properly, I believe they’re being stymied with respect to the knowledge that Meadows has that possibly no one else has, what was happening that day within the White Home, what was President Trump doing.
And Meadows might be one of many solely sources from whom they may get that info. However they’ve a ton of different info. They revealed yesterday they’d interviewed, I believe, over 300 witnesses. They’ve a ton of paperwork, together with some from Meadows himself.
So it looks like they are going to be capable to piece collectively what occurred and what was happening for essentially the most half. However I do assume there’s in all probability sure items of data relating particularly to what was occurring within the White Home that they could not be capable to get so long as Meadows and others who might have that info proceed to refuse to supply it.