The Liberal authorities and Opposition Conservatives are going through calls from inside to mount a extra direct problem to Quebec’s controversial secularism regulation after a instructor was faraway from the classroom for sporting a hijab.
Federal events and their MPs have spent the previous week reacting to the regulation, often called Invoice 21, which bans some public servants deemed to be in positions of authority — similar to academics, judges and cops — from sporting spiritual symbols on the job.
The regulation was handed in 2019, however obtained renewed consideration exterior Quebec final week after information broke that Fatemeh Anvari, a Grade 3 instructor, was informed she might now not educate in a classroom as a result of she wore a hijab.
Learn extra:
Calgary becoming a member of different cities’ assist of authorized problem of Quebec’s Invoice 21
One of many federal politicians calling for a extra forceful condemnation of the regulation was Conservative MP Mark Strahl, a consultant from British Columbia.
Conservative Chief Erin O’Toole has mentioned that whereas he personally opposes the regulation, he believes it’s one which Quebecers alone should cope with and {that a} authorities led by him wouldn’t intervene in any court docket problem to it.
However Strahl mentioned he thinks “some points transcend jurisdiction.”
The MP mentioned he thinks Conservatives ought to re-examine their stance, which he mentioned is unclear, and be ready to problem the regulation in court docket.
“We are able to’t let legal guidelines like that go unchallenged,” he informed reporters earlier than heading into the Tories’ nationwide caucus assembly Wednesday, the place he mentioned the problem can be raised.
“It’s a place that’s shared by many, lots of my colleagues.”
Conservative Sen. Salma Ataullahjan launched an announcement calling Invoice 21 “discriminatory and racist,” saying she can’t in good conscience stay silent whereas fellow Canadians are being blatantly focused.
Learn extra:
Prime Minister Trudeau not entering into battle towards Invoice 21 — for now
In a subsequent interview, she mentioned she felt compelled as a Muslim to talk out and believes there was an absence of management throughout on the problem.
“We are able to’t be selective about human rights,” she mentioned.
Regardless of the want from some to undertake a harder stand, O’Toole and different members of his caucus left the assembly saying nothing had modified.
On his approach out, O’Toole, talking in French, reiterated his private opposition to the regulation and mentioned Conservatives should communicate as a group on vital points.
As for the Liberals, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reiterated Wednesday that he has not dominated out federal intervention “at an acceptable time” in a court docket problem to the regulation. For now although, he advised it’s greatest to let Quebecers themselves lead that battle.
“I believe the one factor to recollect in all that is that Quebecers imagine in a free and open society. Quebecers imagine in freedom of expression, Quebecers imagine within the equality of women and men, Quebecers imagine in freedom of faith, freedom of conscience,” he informed a information convention.
“And proper now, a complete bunch of Quebecers are asking themselves questions on how in a free society somebody might lose her job due to her faith.”
Throughout Wednesday’s query interval, Bloc Quebecois Chief Yves-Francois Blanchet challenged Trudeau to place Quebec’s public opinion on the matter to the check in a referendum. Polls counsel nearly all of Quebecers assist the regulation.
The Bloc chief additionally blasted Trudeau for permitting United Nations Ambassador Bob Rae to name the regulation discriminatory, which Blanchet mentioned amounted to Quebec-bashing.
On Tuesday, NDP Chief Jagmeet Singh shifted from his earlier stance to say he would assist Ottawa stepping right into a court docket problem.
Liberal MP Salma Zahid, who wears a hijab, issued an announcement this week saying it was time for Ottawa to affix the authorized problem towards the regulation mounted by the Nationwide Council of Canadian Muslims and the Canadian Civil Liberties Affiliation.
Learn extra:
Quebec’s Invoice 21 once more faces questions amid outrage over London, Ont. automobile assault
“This can’t be allowed to face unchallenged,” she mentioned.
“Up to now, the problem has come from civil society. However because the social gathering that introduced the Constitution of Rights and Freedoms to Canada, as a authorities that champions human rights world wide, we can’t permit the load of this battle to be carried by civil society alone.”
Montreal Liberal MP Anthony Housefather alsosaid this week he needs a nationwide debate on using and guidelines across the however clause, which Quebec Premier Francois Legault pre-emptively invoked. The clause offers provincial legislatures and Parliament the flexibility to usher in laws that overrides provisions within the Constitution of Rights and Freedoms for 5 years.
It’s a dialog others have advised is lengthy overdue, 4 a long time after the clause was created as a part of constitutional talks. Housefather mentioned the dialogue ought to embrace whether or not the clause could be invoked with out an precise court docket problem of the regulation in query, as Legault did when Invoice 21 was handed.
Newly elected Ottawa Liberal MP Jenna Sudds had related sentiments in an announcement she issued on the secularism regulation. She known as it “a manifestation of illiberal and xenophobic sentiments” that will want federal intervention.
“Canadian governments in any respect ranges have an unwavering dedication to the rules of freedom of faith and expression,” she mentioned. “We can’t in good conscience stand idly by and permit this invoice to go unchallenged, for what we allow, we promote.”
— With information from Mia Rabson
© 2021 The Canadian Press
